From the New World

Share this post

Hunting For Life-Changing Mistakes

www.fromthenew.world

Discover more from From the New World

See the world as it is, not as you wish it to be. Everything else is application.
Over 3,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Hunting For Life-Changing Mistakes

Which Old Books Are Worth Reading? The Ones Forgotten And Hated.

Brian Chau
Nov 15, 2023
14
Share this post

Hunting For Life-Changing Mistakes

www.fromthenew.world
18
Share

In The Sundial Theory Of History, I give a broad outline of my theory of political change. In summary, each era has a series of truths which it denies, equivalently seen as lies that it is founded upon. Then, what is the value of older literature? Shakespeare, Dante, Mark Twain, the Bible? A naive reading is that most older literature is useful, and the more popular it is, the more likely it is to be useful.

Let’s pause and think about what this older literature is supposed to accomplish, and what it accomplishes in practice. Under the sundial theory, a work of older literature ideally reveals a lie the current era is founded upon. When an older perspective differs significantly from that of your era, the difference falls into one of two categories, or in rare cases both. 

From the New World is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

  1. It may be a truth denied by our era. 

  2. It may be a lie supported by its era. 

To complicate this, most normal people don’t know how popular a work was at its time. All they know is how popular a work is in the present. Then, they’re choosing exactly from the pool of older literature that nonetheless succeeds as a work of present literature. So these are ultimately the pool of stories which are “ahead of our time”, which for all intents and purposes don’t reveal a different perspective at all. 

The first rule of reading old books: read old books that were popular in their time but are now unpopular, or better yet censored. This guarantees a book that is genuinely from the perspective of a different era. However, this returns to our initial problem. How do we tell if it contains a truth denied by our era or a lie supported by its era? 

There’s no shortcut here. Don’t take old literature for granted. Treat it as a hypothesis – a possibility for exploration. It might be true. It might not just be false but the precise opposite of the truth. These ideas can be judged the same way you judge anything else: look for evidence, both for and against. 

Perhaps by this point I’ve soured you on old books. I don’t want to give that impression at all. It is incredibly rare to stumble upon a good hypothesis, which is not exactly the same as a true hypothesis. Many true hypotheses are not good. There are dozens of plausible explanations for many events which have exactly zero impact on how you act whether they are true or false. This is my general frustration with both political theory and evolutionary psychology. A great hypothesis is an extremely divergent point. It coincides with a life decision. If it’s true, you make a drastic change in one direction. If it’s false, you do nearly the opposite. The importance of these hypotheses should require no explanation.

And almost no great hypotheses are original.

From the New World is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

14
Share this post

Hunting For Life-Changing Mistakes

www.fromthenew.world
18
Share
18 Comments
Share this discussion

Hunting For Life-Changing Mistakes

www.fromthenew.world
Hermocrates
Nov 17Liked by Brian Chau

Why not just read critically instead of discarding great works? For example, in Herodotus or Thucydides you can extract that the Greeks were a group of petty, vain, and prone to self-interest resulting in their near destruction. In the other hand you can critically infer that the Persian Kings were lording over a diverse, tolerant, empire who thought and generally acted in a much more recognizable manner to us in the west today they were when dealing with troublesome Ionians.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply by Brian Chau
Swagdiddy
Writes Swagdiddy’s Substack
Nov 16

Lol all eras are defined by their lies .. is max pessimo. How about all eras are defined by their truths?

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
9 replies by Brian Chau and others
16 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Brian Chau
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing