AI pluralism is gay, and is for *******. Resulting from generations of indoctrination, it's only use is for corralling cattle to castrate. It'll get you some followers, but that is all. Maybe you can sell them some merch.
Freedom is a flexible principle that pluralism thinks is carved in stone. Freedom is used to it's advantage, by it's removal, when one is in a position of strength, and appealed to when one is in a position of weakness. Don't project your position onto your opponent.
AI pluralism acts from a subjugated position. By embracing pluralism in this position, one resigns the paradox of tolerance boot to stamp on their face -- forever.
This subjugated position doesn't just reduce the effectiveness of AI pluralism, it dooms it's followers.
The movement becomes extremely easy to compromise. If somehow you could avoid that, potential for bias and discrimination doesn't disappear with pluralism, it merely shifts to the groupthink conformity swept along in the mad river of the crowd.
Members will have conflicting objectives, which lead to infighting, lack of direction, and stupefied decision making
The alternative, is acknowledging your environment. You live in a warlord state, not a pluralist state. You can't beg a warlord, he holds the overwhelming balance of power, protects his interests, and hides his vulnerabilities. Begging is off the table, you're only option left is to fight.
The first step after making that decision, is assessing your assets. All those assets the warlords hold. They're gone, you are not getting them back. Forget them.
Coagulate into a small team, build new assets, protect them, and get in the game.
Become a warlord yourself. Then maybe, in some circumstances, you can think about pluralism.
AI pluralism is gay, and is for *******. Resulting from generations of indoctrination, it's only use is for corralling cattle to castrate. It'll get you some followers, but that is all. Maybe you can sell them some merch.
Freedom is a flexible principle that pluralism thinks is carved in stone. Freedom is used to it's advantage, by it's removal, when one is in a position of strength, and appealed to when one is in a position of weakness. Don't project your position onto your opponent.
AI pluralism acts from a subjugated position. By embracing pluralism in this position, one resigns the paradox of tolerance boot to stamp on their face -- forever.
This subjugated position doesn't just reduce the effectiveness of AI pluralism, it dooms it's followers.
The movement becomes extremely easy to compromise. If somehow you could avoid that, potential for bias and discrimination doesn't disappear with pluralism, it merely shifts to the groupthink conformity swept along in the mad river of the crowd.
Members will have conflicting objectives, which lead to infighting, lack of direction, and stupefied decision making
The alternative, is acknowledging your environment. You live in a warlord state, not a pluralist state. You can't beg a warlord, he holds the overwhelming balance of power, protects his interests, and hides his vulnerabilities. Begging is off the table, you're only option left is to fight.
The first step after making that decision, is assessing your assets. All those assets the warlords hold. They're gone, you are not getting them back. Forget them.
Coagulate into a small team, build new assets, protect them, and get in the game.
Become a warlord yourself. Then maybe, in some circumstances, you can think about pluralism.