re: "Microsoft, the primary investor in OpenAI, used a specified prompt to create its Bing assistant. This prompt was discovered within days of release by an interesting person on Twitter"
I'd suggest what was discovered is its ability to hallucinate the prompt. I recall what I think was one of the original articles on the topic, perhaps by whoever discovered this, claiming they had a reason to believe it wasn't a hallucination, but I don't recall what the reason was since it wasn't remotely convincing and therefore not memorable.
Do you think the wokeness of OpenAI is more a matter of the political ideology of its leadership (as I got from your first post in the series) or of PR/risk management (as this post seems to imply)? Does it matter in terms of achieving a more neutral/truthful AI?
Also, I think these hacks like DAN will be used by less than <1 percent and those users will already know the gist of the uncensored answers. Overwhelmingly then the world will be further indoctrinated into progressive ideology by ChatGPT. AI may certainly be a force for net good overall, but I can't see how it will do anything but advance woke/reality-denying ideology.
"Sorry, your IP address has been identified as one I cannot reply to."
re: "Microsoft, the primary investor in OpenAI, used a specified prompt to create its Bing assistant. This prompt was discovered within days of release by an interesting person on Twitter"
I'd suggest what was discovered is its ability to hallucinate the prompt. I recall what I think was one of the original articles on the topic, perhaps by whoever discovered this, claiming they had a reason to believe it wasn't a hallucination, but I don't recall what the reason was since it wasn't remotely convincing and therefore not memorable.
Do you think the wokeness of OpenAI is more a matter of the political ideology of its leadership (as I got from your first post in the series) or of PR/risk management (as this post seems to imply)? Does it matter in terms of achieving a more neutral/truthful AI?
Also, I think these hacks like DAN will be used by less than <1 percent and those users will already know the gist of the uncensored answers. Overwhelmingly then the world will be further indoctrinated into progressive ideology by ChatGPT. AI may certainly be a force for net good overall, but I can't see how it will do anything but advance woke/reality-denying ideology.